Look Both Ways

Essay · September 2026 · 7 min

One reader’s reflection, not teaching and not the Church speaking. A father writing about what he gave his sons and what he left out. About 7 minutes.

You teach a kid to look both ways before they're old enough to know what a car is.

You don't explain traffic. You don't lecture on momentum or stopping distance or the odds. You just take the small hand at the curb and you say it, every time, until the day you notice they do it on their own without being told — head left, head right, then go. You didn't teach them a fact. You taught them to look. To check, by reflex, for something real they can't yet see coming.

We do it with all of them. Look both ways. Don't touch the stove. Don't get in the car with someone you don't know. None of it is a lecture. It's a set of small reflexes you hand a person before they can understand them, because the understanding can come later but the looking has to come now.

I've been thinking about which of those reflexes I actually gave my kids. And which one I missed.

Because here's the thing about teaching someone to look. Once they've looked, they can't un-look. You can not-know something your whole life and walk clean past it — there's no fault in missing a door you were never shown. But the moment someone shows you the crossing, a choice walks in and sits down and never leaves: from here on, you look, or you decide not to. Doing nothing used to be innocent. Now it's a decision.

That's the strange weight of the thing. It's why you're careful with it. And it's why it matters that you don't skip it.

The reflex I got handed, the big one, was this: work hard and you'll make it. Nose to the grindstone. You'll have setbacks — get up, try again, you can do it. I still catch myself saying the last part out loud to my dog, Bean, on a hot uphill walk. You can do it. And every time I say it, Bean picks up the pace. It works — that's the thing. There's real truth in it; it carried me further than a lot of things did.

But look at what kind of promise it actually is. It works exactly as far as a hot uphill walk works. It's a promise about this board — effort in, reward out, here, now. Get the paper, keep your head down, the world settles up with you eventually. And it's not that the promise is a lie. It's that it's small. It answers one question — how do I get ahead — and then it lets you believe that's the only question on the table.

I've got two sons in their thirties, so I've watched the promise get tested. One went and got the paper — the degree, the thing we all swore was the key — and walked straight into an ocean of people holding the exact same paper, in a world that had stopped hiring on it. The other's been knocking two years for steady work with benefits, and the door mostly hasn't opened. I'm not telling you the system's broken; plenty of people I could name are doing fine. But I pass driveways with five cars parked in them, grown kids' cars, and I don't think it's just my two.

I could turn that into an argument about the economy. I'm not going to — it isn't the point, and it's the wrong board to be angry at. Here's the point. The promise I handed down — the only reflex I ever gave them for what life is for — was pinned to a board that can come up empty. And even when it pays, even when the paper works and the job lands, it reaches exactly as far as this life and not one inch past it. I taught them how to cross one street. I never mentioned there was another one.

Because there's a second economy. Older than this one, running underneath it the whole time, with its own currency and its own scoreboard — and it's the one that doesn't come up empty. Nobody taught me to look at it either. I found it late, on my own, stubborn about it. And the thing I most want to hand my kids now isn't a sharper strategy for the first board. It's the reflex I skipped: there's more here than the street in front of you. Look.

Think about how it actually went in the garden. The serpent didn't show up with a lie anyone could catch. God had said the fruit brings death. The serpent says: you shall not surely die — you'll be like God, knowing good and evil. And here's the part we skip past: that was nearly true. They ate, and their eyes did open. They did come to know good and evil. He didn't sell Eve a fantasy. He took the real tree, the real God, the real ache to become something more — and he moved one piece. Not what she wanted. Who she had to trust to get it. Same tree, same longing, one thing shifted. That's all it took to lose the garden.

That's the whole trick, and it's never changed. The best lie is the one standing closest to the truth.

Not the opposite of the truth — the opposite is easy, you see it coming a mile off. The dangerous one stands right next to the real thing, borrows its face, and moves a single piece while you're looking at everything that's still true.

Watch it run on your kid. He's going to grow up feeling something the grindstone gospel never accounted for — that there's a contest on, that something is off, that he's being pulled at. And he's right. He is being contended for; there is another side. That much is true, and he'll feel it in his bones. Then a hundred voices will rush in to tell him who's on the other side of it. The state. The rich. The other party. The 1%. The people not like him. Same true ache — someone is against me — one piece moved: the enemy's face. And because everything around the swap is real, he'll never feel the switch happen. He'll just wake up one day certain he knows who the enemy is, aimed with his whole heart at a person.

Which is exactly what you'd do, if you were the real one and wanted to stay hidden. You wouldn't talk him out of the fight. You'd hand him the wrong enemy and let him spend his life swinging.

So who is it, then. If the fight is real and the enemy's been painted the wrong color, the honest thing — the only thing — is to stop swinging long enough to ask who's actually on the other side. And the moment you ask that for real, you've turned your head in a direction the grindstone never pointed. You're not staring across the street at another person anymore. You're looking past it.

That's the whole gift. Not the answer — the direction.

I can't hand my kids a conclusion. I wouldn't want to; it wouldn't take, the same way none of those churches took when someone tried to hand me one. What took was digging. Nobody sat me down. Something just wouldn't let me stop looking, and when I looked, there was a whole world back there — older, realer, and busier than anyone had let on. God, it turns out, has been up to things. Lately, even. That's the part that stops you: not a museum, not a rulebook from a long time ago, but Someone still moving, still answering, still contending for the exact people who were never told the game was on.

And there's the reason none of this lands on a grown person's radar. Almost nobody gets handed it small. Every other reflex we drill in early, at the curb, before the child can understand it — but this one we save for later, and later mostly doesn't come. So we grow up not looking, because you don't check by reflex for something nobody taught you to check for. It was never hidden. It just never got built in.

So what I actually want to give them is small, and it's the earliest possible version of look-both-ways. Just this: there's more here than the street in front of you. People dig for what's under it — anyone can, it isn't reserved for priests or scholars or the already-sure. And what's under it isn't a philosophy. It's a Person, and He's still at it. That's all. I'm not going to walk them the rest of the way; I couldn't if I tried. I only want them looking in the one direction I got pointed too late.

Here's what changed, and why I can't leave this one alone.

I know now. That's the whole difference. Most of my life I didn't, and there's no fault in that — you can't be blamed for not checking a direction nobody showed you. But I've looked. And once you've looked, you can't un-look; the not-knowing is gone and it doesn't come back. Which means for me, now, saying nothing to my kids isn't the neutral thing it would have been a few years ago. It's a choice. It's the one omission I'd actually have to answer for.

So I'll teach them to look both ways. All of them. Left, right — and the one I almost missed.

I picture the small version of each of them at a curb, hand in mine, learning the reflex before they understand the reason. Head left. Head right. And someday, without my saying it, one more glance — up, or in, or wherever the real thing is — checking by habit for what they can't yet see is there. I don't need them to arrive anywhere by Tuesday. I just need them looking. The rest of the road is theirs to walk.

The cars will still be stacked in the driveways. The paper will still not open the doors it promised. That first board was always uncertain. But there's a second one, and it doesn't come up empty.

Look both ways. Then cross.